|
|
|
| |
Cost Estimates and Overall Recommendations
The priority ranking of corridors for further study in the Central Arkansas region, along with their likely technology possibilities are as follows:
|
|
1st Priority
|
The Central Corridors, with streetcars as a candidate technology in railroad or on-street
environments, with commuter rail as a candidate in a railroad environment, with light rail as a
strong candidate in a railroad environment and a moderately strong candidate in an on-street
environment.
|
|
|
2nd Priority
|
The West Corridor, with commuter rail or light rail as likely candidates, primarily
focused on the I-630 corridor, with streetcars on Cantrell Road and the LRW railroad corridor
and HOV lanes/busways on I-630 as candidate alternative modes.
|
|
|
3rd Priority
|
The Northeast Corridor, with commuter rail or light rail as likely rail candidates,
and with HOV lanes/busways as a candidate alternative mode.
|
|
|
4th Priority
|
The Southwest Corridor, with commuter rail and light rail as likely potential modes,
and HOV/busways as a candidate alternative mode.
|
|
|
5th Priority
|
The Northwest Corridor, with commuter rail and light rail as likely potential modes,
and HOV/busways as a candidate alternative mode.
|
View Corridor Map
|
Corridors by Priority
|
Approximate Length
|
Recommended Technologies*
|
Approximate Capital Cost Ranges in Millions*
|
|
1. Central Corridors
|
3 miles (avg.)
|
Commuter Rail
|
$12 - $60
|
|
Streetcars
|
$9 - $21
|
|
Light Rail
|
$60 - $120
|
|
2. West Corridors
|
12 miles
|
Commuter Rail
|
$24 - $180
|
|
Light Rail
|
$180 - $480
|
|
Streetcars
|
$36 - $84
|
|
HOV/Busways
|
$96 - $360
|
|
3. Northeast Corridor
|
23 miles
|
Commuter Rail
|
$46 - $345
|
|
Light Rail
|
$345 - $920
|
|
HOV/Busways
|
$184 - $690
|
|
4. Southwest Corridor
|
24 miles
|
Commuter Rail
|
$48 - $360
|
|
Light Rail
|
$360 - $960
|
|
HOV/Busways
|
$192 - $720
|
|
5. Northwest Corridor
|
31 miles
|
Commuter Rail
|
$62 - $465
|
|
Light Rail
|
$465 - $1,240
|
|
HOV/Busways
|
$248 - $930
|
*Note: Priority technologies for each corridor listed in bold; alternative lower-priority technologies listed in italics.
Transit-oriented development
Rail technology examples
Population growth trends
Corridor screening matrix
Corridor map
Back to Regional Rail Main Page
|
| |